These components are free, for Mac, Windows, and more.Īpplicable to many of the other answers here - the Type 1 JDBC-to-ODBC Bridge that most are referring to is the one Sun built in to and bundled with the JVM. JVM/JRE/JDK documentation has always advised against using this built-in except in experimental scenarios, or when no other option exists, because this component was built as a proof-of-concept, and was never intended for production use. ![]() My employer makes an enterprise-grade JDBC-to-ODBC Bridge, available as either a Single-Tier (installs entirely on the client application host) or a Multi-Tier (splits components over the client application host and the ODBC data source host, enabling JDBC client applications in any JVM to use ODBC data sources on Mac, Windows, Linux, etc.). This solution isn't free.Īll of the above can be used with the ODBC Drivers for Sybase & Microsoft SQL Server (or other databases) we also produce. ĥ years, 4 months ago Related Topics macos sql-server Comments 14 years ago The download link for Gorilla SQL seems to be broken. VersionTracker is using the same link, so that one's broken as well. ![]() Hacking the URL seems to show the whole site is down… Know of any working download locations? 14 years ago SQuirreL SQL and all other Java-based clients I've tried so far for connecting to ODBC DBs simply don't work on OS X. They all complain about the JDBC/ODBC driver missing. Maybe it's just my computer…? 13 years, 11 months ago Not just your computer. I can't get any of the Java ones to work either. 13 years, 5 months ago Navicat is fairly good, except is has some quirks like getting listings of every table and field in every database on the server.basically killing MySQL while it's doing that. I don't Navicat myself, but one of the guys I work with does and something he does causes this. 13 years, 4 months ago I probably should have been a little bit more detailed. I have been using DbVisualizer but it seems to chew up a lot of memory on Mac os x. It doesn't do to bad on windows and I don't seem to have a problem with it there. 13 years, 4 months ago I've used it extensively, and find it very mature. This application addresses those who require a DBMS that is compact and which offers consistent results, and most importantly, supports multiple database types and servers concurrently.It also has lots of nice extras (script generation, SQL formatting and highlighting, metadata displays, cross-DB table copying). Capable database administration tool, whose main emphasis is centered on managing multiple databases simultaneously The said queries can be built and visualized in both 2D and 3D.įurthermore, addressing debugging and importing, and exporting is also possible, and users will benefit from several, purpose-fit wizards. When going past the main database visualization characteristics, demanding users and those seeking additional functionality will be able to also perform a multitude of other tasks, ranging from creating and executing SQLs, and all the way up to managing connections and storage. ![]() Rely on the included admin tools, as well as the IDE, in order to perform debugging and take DBMS to the next level Combine that with the accessible structure visualizer, as well as the navigation features, and you’ve got a pretty effective endeavor. ![]() We believe that this offers users a high degree of flexibility and efficiency, as they will be able to manage several database instances concurrently. It does not only support multiple database types but also multiple server instances simultaneously. Support for multiple server instances offers a versatile and flexible approach to administering multiple databasesĪ multitude of database types are supported by Aqua Data Studio, and right from the start, we feel that this is one of its main strengths. Aqua Data Studio, however, was designed in order to offer users a clever way of tackling the administration of multiple database environments simultaneously, of different types, in order to achieve a centralized database management system. Things become even more complex when the distinction between visualizers and actual DBMSs becomes blurred. Database administration can be challenging, especially when dealing head-on with the scalable nature of such endeavors, as well as the inherent complexity of the contained elements.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |